Files
opencode-devbox/.gitea/workflows
joakimp 18b9c9c549
Validate / docs-check (push) Successful in 10s
Validate / base-change-warning (push) Successful in 16s
Validate / validate-with-pi (push) Successful in 4m10s
Validate / validate-omos (push) Successful in 4m34s
Validate / validate-base (push) Has been cancelled
Validate / validate-omos-with-pi (push) Has been cancelled
CI: harden promote-base-latest (pinned crane + skip on cache-hit)
Two workflow-only changes for promote-base-latest, no image-side impact:

T14 \u2014 replace imjasonh/setup-crane@v0.4 with direct pinned crane install.
The action's bootstrap script calls api.github.com/.../releases/latest
at every run to discover the crane version. That call periodically
rate-limits and returns JSON without .tag_name, jq emits 'null', the
action then downloads .../releases/download/null/... \u2192 404 \u2192 'gzip:
unexpected end of file' \u2192 exit 2. We hit this on the v1.15.3 release
(2026-05-16) where it was cosmetic only \u2014 base-latest was already
correct from cache hit \u2014 but the red-X is annoying.

Replaced with curl + tar pinned to crane v0.21.6 (latest at time of
change). Same pattern as other GitHub-sourced binaries in the
Dockerfile layer (gosu, fzf, eza etc.); operator bumps CRANE_VERSION
deliberately when wanting updates.

T15 \u2014 gate promote-base-latest on need_build == 'true'. When the base
layer's content hash hasn't changed (cache hit on existing base-<hash>
from a prior run), base-latest already points at the correct digest.
The retag is a tautology, and any transient failure of it produces a
red-X for an operation that didn't need to happen. Skipping the job
entirely on cache-hit is correct and removes a whole class of cosmetic
failure. Manual workflow_dispatch with promote_latest=true still bypasses
the gate as an escape hatch (e.g., if base-latest got hand-deleted and
needs regeneration without rebuilding the base).

This will not trigger a CI publish run (main-branch commit, no tag).
2026-05-18 21:45:10 +02:00
..