Found by the reliability testing, in the tool's own security-relevant check:
boundary() used plain `git status --porcelain`, which OMITS ignored files. A child
writing .env, a credential, or a build artefact into a root therefore read back
as CLEAN. Measured on a fixture repo: an ignored secret.txt produced ZERO
porcelain lines, and `!! secret.txt` once --ignored was passed.
Now always `status --porcelain --ignored`, keeping a sha256 + entry count and
substituting it for the text above 8 KB so a node_modules tree cannot dump
megabytes into every audit dir. Also detects a root whose kind changes.
selftest grows 10 -> 14 checks. The GIT path had NO coverage at all before this
(only the manifest path did), despite being what every real run uses: now covers
clean-repo, ignored-file (the regression), modified-tracked-file, and HEAD move.
Adversarial suite documented in the README: T1 false premise -> correctly
status=failed; T2 tempting write under read_only -> refused, repo verified
untouched by a second route; T3 poisoned caller-asserted fact (wrong node pin)
-> contradicted the caller from the file, and corrected the downstream inference.
T3 is the important one: caller-asserted context.facts is a confabulation vector
this design introduces, and it held.
Still untested, stated in the README rather than implied: no real child has ever
tripped the boundary diff (T2 refused), everything so far is read-only analysis,
nothing iterative, and all specs were written with more care than a rushed one.
Also: add .gitignore (repo had none) and remove the bin/__pycache__ I left behind.
`fork` passes the child getHeader()+getBranch() -- the whole untrimmed parent
branch -- so in a long session it continues the parent's narrative instead of
doing the task (4/4 dispatches on 2026-09-06 ignored their brief; one filed a
diary entry as the parent). Upstream considers that by design.
bin/pi-task inverts the defaults: context is an explicit, default-empty JSON
spec; the child is a fresh isolated session with --no-extensions (so the
mempalace bridge, an extension, cannot file anything under our identity); and
the answer must parse as a declared envelope or the task is recorded FAILED
regardless of how fluent the prose was. Adds a post-hoc boundary diff over
roots[], a per-run audit dir, wall-clock kill and post-hoc cost accounting.
`pi-task selftest` feeds the validator 1 known-good + 6 known-bad envelopes and
a two-sided boundary check, and aborts if any pair fails to discriminate.
Measured while building, and documented in the README rather than smoothed over:
* a fresh session removes the parent's VOICE but not slot-filling -- given a
self-contradictory spec, a zero-context child invented a task, read the
README and returned a well-formed envelope nobody asked for. Fresh context
fixes continuation, not confabulation.
* read_only is VERIFIED, not enforced: pi has no tool allow/deny list, so
--no-extensions leaves core read/write/edit/bash in place.
* a pointer is checked for presence, not checkability ("arithmetic fact" passes).
* budget.usd is post-hoc; only wall_s is enforced.
Deliberately NOT wired into install.sh: per the 2026-09-06 decision, bake only
after the envelope has been beaten up on real work. First real run is committed
as examples/task-mempalace-pi-adapter.json.
joakimp