opencode-ai 1.14.44 published 20:26 UTC (1.14.43 skipped upstream).
Bumping to 1.14.44 instead of re-running the failed v1.14.42 build
gives us the same 3h CI cost and picks up upstream bug fixes.
Closes the v1.14.42 omos-with-pi gap. The v1.14.42 tag's
build-omos-with-pi job failed during publish: oh-my-opencode-slim@1.0.7
had been published with a dependency on @opencode-ai/sdk@1.14.44, and
our build hit the npm registry within ~2 minutes of that SDK version
landing -- before the tarball had propagated across npm's CDN. The
manifest's dist-tags.latest pointed at 1.14.44 but a tarball fetch on
/-/sdk-1.14.44.tgz returned 404. Tarball is now fully fetchable.
Result on Docker Hub once v1.14.44 publishes:
v1.14.42 / latest -> stable (3 of 4 variants)
v1.14.42-omos / latest-omos -> stable
v1.14.42-with-pi / latest-with-pi -> stable
v1.14.42-omos-with-pi -> NEVER PUBLISHED (404 if pulled)
latest-omos-with-pi -> still v1.14.41b until v1.14.44
v1.14.44 / latest -> NEW (replaces latest)
v1.14.44-omos / latest-omos -> NEW
v1.14.44-with-pi / latest-with-pi -> NEW
v1.14.44-omos-with-pi / latest-omos-with-pi -> NEW (closes the gap)
CHANGELOG: v1.14.44 entry added with the propagation-race rationale,
v1.14.42 entry annotated with the known gap. Reverse-chrono preserved.
The split-base build architecture, the NPM_CONFIG_PREFIX gotcha, the
hash-driven base cache reuse mechanism, and the cutover plan from
docker-publish.yml to docker-publish-split.yml were previously
scattered across:
- inline Dockerfile.base / Dockerfile.variant comments
- CHANGELOG Unreleased entries
- AGENTS.md mentions
- docker-publish-split.yml header comment
- my own session notes
Consolidate into .gitea/README.md as the canonical architectural doc.
Gitea (like GitHub) auto-renders this when navigating to .gitea/ in
the web UI, so anyone investigating 'why is CI shaped this way?'
finds it on the first click. Cross-referenced from AGENTS.md as the
first thing to read when touching CI.
Covers:
- The two release pipelines and why both exist
- Why split-base: cross-variant cache misses on layer-hash-divergence
- The 6 phases of the split-base pipeline with an ASCII diagram
- base-decide hash inputs and Docker Hub probe logic
- NPM_CONFIG_PREFIX variant-override pattern (the volume-shadow trap)
- Registry cache strategy (mode=max for cross-arch reuse)
- Wall-clock estimates: version-bump vs base-touching releases
- Validate workflow role
- Runner expectations: catthehacker image, disk reclaim, concurrency,
Gitea Actions @v4 artifact incompatibility
- 4-step migration plan from docker-publish.yml to .split.yml
- Cross-refs to related docs
Does not duplicate AGENTS.md content; links to it for domain facts and
release-day checklist.
2026-05-09 19:28:03 +02:00
5 changed files with 308 additions and 2 deletions
This directory contains the gitea Actions workflows and the supporting
documentation for opencode-devbox's CI. If you're investigating *why*
the build pipeline is shaped the way it is, you're in the right place.
## Workflows in this directory
| File | Trigger | Role |
|---|---|---|
| [`workflows/docker-publish.yml`](workflows/docker-publish.yml) | `push: tags: v*` | **Production release pipeline.** Multi-arch build of all four variants (`base`, `omos`, `with-pi`, `omos-with-pi`), publish to Docker Hub, update Hub description. ~165–180 min wall clock. |
| [`workflows/docker-publish-split.yml`](workflows/docker-publish-split.yml) | `workflow_dispatch` (manual) | **Experimental split-base pipeline.** Two-phase build: shared `base-<hash>` published once, then four thin variant deltas. Estimated ~30–40 min on cache hit, ~70–90 min when base needs rebuilding. Not yet validated end-to-end; once 1–2 dispatch test runs prove it, this will take over `on: push: tags: v*` and `docker-publish.yml` will be retired. |
| [`workflows/validate.yml`](workflows/validate.yml) | `push: branches: main` + PR | **Lightweight gate.** amd64-only smoke test of all four variants + `DOCKER_HUB.md` sync check. ~30 min. Fires on every push to `main`. |
## Why two release pipelines exist
opencode-devbox publishes **four image variants** (`base`, `omos`, `with-pi`, `omos-with-pi`) ×**two architectures** (amd64, arm64) = **eight image tags per release**. Today's runners are 2 self-hosted gitea Actions runners. arm64 builds are emulated under QEMU, which is the dominant cost (~3–5x slower than native).
The four variants share ~95% of their layers (Debian + apt + Node + AWS CLI + mempalace + dev tools + entrypoints). The original `Dockerfile` was a single multi-stage build with `INSTALL_*` build-args gating variant-specific RUNs. BuildKit's per-layer cache key is content-addressed, but as soon as a build-arg-gated `RUN` produces a different layer hash for variant A vs variant B, every subsequent layer also has a different parent → identical commands re-execute per variant. Result: minimal cross-variant cache reuse on a fresh build.
Two improvements were considered:
1.**Reorder the original Dockerfile** so all variant-gated RUNs land at the bottom — modest gain, ~10–20% wall-clock reduction. *Not pursued.*
2.**Split into `Dockerfile.base` + `Dockerfile.variant`** with the base published as a long-lived shared image — significant gain, ~50–70% wall-clock reduction with hash-driven cache reuse. *Pursued.*
The split-base architecture is what the `docker-publish-split.yml` workflow exercises.
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ Docker image packaging [opencode](https://opencode.ai) into a production-ready d
-`scripts/generate-dockerhub-md.py` — generates `DOCKER_HUB.md` from a hand-maintained `HUB_TEMPLATE` constant. `--check` fails if the committed file is out of sync (enforced by the `validate` workflow).
-`DOCKER_HUB.md` — **auto-generated** from `HUB_TEMPLATE` in `scripts/generate-dockerhub-md.py`. Do not edit directly. Pushed to Docker Hub description via CI API call. Must stay under 25 kB. Short description field must be ≤100 bytes.
-`README.md` — authoritative source documentation for everything in this repo. Independent of `DOCKER_HUB.md`: the Hub doc is hand-maintained in the generator's `HUB_TEMPLATE` and intentionally slim, linking back to the gitea README for depth.
-`.gitea/README.md` — **read this first** if you're touching CI. Architectural overview of the build pipeline (production vs split-base), wall-clock estimates, NPM_CONFIG_PREFIX gotcha, runner expectations, migration plan.
-`.gitea/workflows/validate.yml` — lightweight amd64 build + smoke test on push to main and PRs. Also runs the DOCKER_HUB.md sync check.
-`.gitea/workflows/docker-publish.yml` — production CI pipeline on tag push: smoke-test each variant on amd64, then full multi-arch (amd64 + arm64) build-and-push, then update Docker Hub description.
-`.gitea/workflows/docker-publish-split.yml` — **WIP, branch `feat/split-build` only.** Two-phase split-base pipeline. Triggers on `workflow_dispatch` only so it runs alongside the production pipeline without conflict. Pushes to user-supplied `release_tag` input (e.g. `v0.0.0-split-test`); `latest*` aliases only updated when `promote_latest: true`. Compute base hash, conditionally build base, then 4 variant deltas in parallel.
@@ -8,12 +8,26 @@ Tags follow `v{opencode_version}[letter]` — bare tag for the first build on a
## Unreleased
Docs:
- **New: `.gitea/README.md`** — architectural overview of the build pipeline. Documents the production single-Dockerfile path vs the merged-but-unvalidated split-base path, hash-driven base cache reuse, wall-clock estimates, the `NPM_CONFIG_PREFIX` variant-override pattern, runner expectations (catthehacker container, disk reclaim, concurrency, gitea-actions @v4 artifact gotcha), and the cutover plan. Auto-renders when navigating to `.gitea/` in the gitea web UI. Linked from `AGENTS.md` as the first thing to read when touching CI.
Build pipeline (merged to main as `Dockerfile.base` + `Dockerfile.variant` + `.gitea/workflows/docker-publish-split.yml`, NOT yet validated end-to-end — the `workflow_dispatch` test against `:base-<hash>` + `:v0.0.0-split-test*` aliases is still the gating step before this can take over `on: push: tags: v*`):
- **New: split-base build pipeline.** `Dockerfile.base` (variant-independent layers — apt, locales, AWS CLI, Node.js, mempalace, gitea-mcp, user setup, chromadb prewarm, ENVs, entrypoints) builds once and is published as `joakimp/opencode-devbox:base-<sha>`. `Dockerfile.variant``FROM`s that base and adds only opencode/omos/pi installs (or skips them per build-args). Companion workflow `.gitea/workflows/docker-publish-split.yml` runs as a `workflow_dispatch`-only pipeline alongside the existing `docker-publish.yml` so they don't conflict. Hash-driven base reuse: a content hash of `Dockerfile.base + rootfs/ + entrypoint*.sh` becomes the base tag; if the tag already exists on Docker Hub, the base build is skipped entirely. Estimated wall clock: version-bump-only release ~30–40 min (vs ~165–180 min today); base-touching release ~60–70 min. Trade-off: two Dockerfiles to maintain, and `npm install -g` in the variant must override `NPM_CONFIG_PREFIX=/usr` per-RUN to keep baked binaries off the volume-shadowed path. Once 1–2 successful workflow_dispatch runs validate the output against the existing pipeline, the new workflow takes over `on: push: tags: v*` and the original is retired.
## v1.14.44 — 2026-05-09
opencode 1.14.42 → 1.14.44 bump (1.14.43 skipped upstream). Also completes the matrix coverage that v1.14.42 missed: `build-omos-with-pi` failed mid-publish on v1.14.42 due to an upstream npm CDN propagation race — `oh-my-opencode-slim@1.0.7` had been published declaring a dependency on `@opencode-ai/sdk@1.14.44`, and our build hit the registry within ~2 minutes of that SDK version landing, before the tarball had propagated across npm's CDN. The build returned 404 on the SDK fetch even though the manifest's `dist-tags.latest` already pointed at 1.14.44. Tarball is now fully fetchable; v1.14.44 builds cleanly across all four variants.
- **Bump:** opencode 1.14.42 → 1.14.44 (`OPENCODE_VERSION` build-arg default in both `Dockerfile` and `Dockerfile.variant`).
Known gap: `joakimp/opencode-devbox:v1.14.42-omos-with-pi` and the corresponding `latest-omos-with-pi` alias were NOT published in the v1.14.42 release (`build-omos-with-pi` job failed for the reason above). `latest-omos-with-pi` continued pointing at v1.14.41b until v1.14.44 published. Users on the `latest-omos-with-pi` floating tag were unaffected; users pulling explicit `:v1.14.42-omos-with-pi` would get a 404 from Hub. Closed by v1.14.44.
## v1.14.42 — 2026-05-09
**Note:** Of the 4 multi-arch variants, 3 published cleanly (`v1.14.42`, `v1.14.42-omos`, `v1.14.42-with-pi`, plus their `latest*` aliases). `build-omos-with-pi` failed during the publish step due to an upstream npm CDN propagation race (see v1.14.44 entry above for detail). Re-running the failed job would have required another full ~3h matrix rerun in gitea Actions; we chose to bump opencode to 1.14.44 instead and let the next tag close the gap.
opencode 1.14.41 → 1.14.42 bump. Carries along all container-side changes accumulated since v1.14.41b: pi package rename to `@earendil-works/*`, npm-prefix-on-volume fix, Hub doc rewrite, README/AGENTS docs catchup.
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.