fix(ci): skip the BuildKit check whose warning embedded this Dockerfile in CI output
Lint / hadolint (push) Successful in 10s
Lint / skill-floor (push) Failing after 13s
Lint / doc-drift (push) Successful in 18s
Lint / actionlint (push) Successful in 33s
Publish Docker Image / lint-gate (push) Successful in 32s
Publish Docker Image / resolve-versions (push) Successful in 17s
Publish Docker Image / base-decide (push) Successful in 13s
Publish Docker Image / build-base (push) Has been skipped
Publish Docker Image / smoke-studio (push) Successful in 5m38s
Publish Docker Image / smoke (push) Successful in 8m20s
Publish Docker Image / build-variant-studio (push) Successful in 20m34s
Publish Docker Image / build-variant (push) Successful in 21m5s
Publish Docker Image / update-description (push) Successful in 8s
Publish Docker Image / promote-base-latest (push) Successful in 9s
Lint / hadolint (push) Successful in 10s
Lint / skill-floor (push) Failing after 13s
Lint / doc-drift (push) Successful in 18s
Lint / actionlint (push) Successful in 33s
Publish Docker Image / lint-gate (push) Successful in 32s
Publish Docker Image / resolve-versions (push) Successful in 17s
Publish Docker Image / base-decide (push) Successful in 13s
Publish Docker Image / build-base (push) Has been skipped
Publish Docker Image / smoke-studio (push) Successful in 5m38s
Publish Docker Image / smoke (push) Successful in 8m20s
Publish Docker Image / build-variant-studio (push) Successful in 20m34s
Publish Docker Image / build-variant (push) Successful in 21m5s
Publish Docker Image / update-description (push) Successful in 8s
Publish Docker Image / promote-base-latest (push) Successful in 9s
v1.10.1 (run 707) failed with ZERO failing steps: every step Success, `smoke` printing "101 passed, 0 failed", `smoke-studio` "104 passed, 0 failed", both jobs red. The clipboard fix fromf3b3748worked exactly as predicted; this is a second, independent defect that run 704 had masked. CHAIN, measured end to end rather than reasoned: `ARG BASE_IMAGE` has no default on purpose (the two-phase build always supplies it), which trips BuildKit's InvalidDefaultArgInFrom check. buildx attaches that warning's source context to the build metadata as buildx.build.warnings[].sourceInfo.data — the ENTIRE Dockerfile, base64, on ONE line. docker/build-push-action writes that metadata to $GITHUB_OUTPUT as a `name<<ghadelimiter_<uuid>` heredoc. Gitea's act_runner truncates any single line at exactly 65536 chars, so the closing delimiter was cut off: invalid format delimiter 'ghadelimiter_...' not found before end of file and the runner failed the job while attributing it to no step at all. v1.9.4 run 695 SUCCESS: longest metadata line 56355, 0 delimiter errors v1.10.0 run 704 failed : longest metadata line 65536, 1 delimiter error v1.10.1 run 707 failed : longest metadata line 65536, 1 delimiter error 65536 = 2^16: cut AT the cap, not merely long. Independent route via file size rather than log parsing: 42251 B at v1.9.4 (base64 56335, matching the log) vs 50034 B now (base64 66712, truncated). The cap corresponds to a 49152 B Dockerfile, so this cycle's comment growth crossed it by 882 B. Located by asking which top-level metadata key CONTAINS the base64, instead of assuming: it is buildx.build.warnings -> sourceInfo -> data in BOTH runs. THIS IS THE SECOND FIX FOR THIS BUG. The first, `provenance: false` on the two smoke build steps, was committed as784fad7and is REVERTED here: a real buildx on another host showed provenance metadata present in both modes with a longest string of 71 chars, i.e. the base64 was never in provenance. Shipping it would have left the release broken a third time while looking like a fix. Also rejected, each measured: floating action tags moving (act action-bundle hashes byte-identical between runs 695 and 707, all four) and the build-check annotation text changing (byte-identical). FIX: `# check=skip=InvalidDefaultArgInFrom` as the FIRST line of Dockerfile.variant — BuildKit parses `# check=` only before any other line, so placement is load-bearing. No honest default exists for BASE_IMAGE: `scratch` would satisfy the linter while being a lie, and would convert today's instant "invalid reference format" into a failure deep in the build. Verified against the actual edited file with `docker buildx build --check`: "Check complete, no warnings found." Zero warnings means no sourceInfo, so the longest metadata line drops 65536 -> ~1936 and the file's SIZE stops gating CI. GUARD: scripts/check-dockerfile-directives.sh, wired into BOTH lint.yml and docker-publish.yml's lint-gate, because a check that gates only `push` lets a tag regress — the adoption slip that let doc-drift land 27 h after the v1.9.3 tag. It also fails if ARG BASE_IMAGE gains a default, so the directive cannot rot into guarding a check that can no longer fire. Truth table, exit codes: present 0, removed 1, demoted to line 2 → 1, ARG defaulted 1, file missing 2 (a gate that cannot run must not pass). Release renamed v1.10.1 -> v1.10.2 with both failed tags left standing as tombstones. Docs swept again (README "since" marker, Dockerfile decision comments) because CI reads them from the TAG. Gates: doc-drift 23 OK / 0 DRIFT; base-hash, workflow-shell, skill-floor, lint-shell (17 files now), dockerfile-directives all rc=0.
This commit is contained in:
+37
-3
@@ -1,3 +1,37 @@
|
||||
# check=skip=InvalidDefaultArgInFrom
|
||||
#
|
||||
# ^ MUST stay the FIRST line of this file, and it is load-bearing for CI, not
|
||||
# style. BuildKit parses `# check=` only before any other line, so moving it
|
||||
# below the title comment silently disables it.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Why it exists: `ARG BASE_IMAGE` (below) deliberately has NO default — this
|
||||
# file is only ever built by the two-phase CI with --build-arg BASE_IMAGE=
|
||||
# <image>:base-<hash>. BuildKit's InvalidDefaultArgInFrom check flags that as
|
||||
# "default value for global ARG results in an empty or invalid base image
|
||||
# name". There is no honest default to give it: `scratch` would satisfy the
|
||||
# linter while being a lie (nothing here can build FROM scratch), and it would
|
||||
# convert today's instant "invalid reference format" into a failure deep in the
|
||||
# build. So the check is skipped by name, with the reason written down.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# What the warning actually COST, which is why this is not cosmetic: buildx
|
||||
# attaches the warning's source context to the build metadata as
|
||||
# buildx.build.warnings[].sourceInfo.data — the ENTIRE Dockerfile, base64, on
|
||||
# ONE line. docker/build-push-action writes that metadata to $GITHUB_OUTPUT as
|
||||
# a `name<<ghadelimiter_<uuid>` heredoc, and Gitea's act_runner truncates any
|
||||
# single line at exactly 65536 chars. Once base64(this file) crossed 64 KiB the
|
||||
# closing delimiter was cut off, and the runner failed the job with
|
||||
# invalid format delimiter 'ghadelimiter_...' not found before end of file
|
||||
# and NO failing step: every step green, smoke suite "0 failed", job red.
|
||||
# Measured: 42251 B at v1.9.4 -> base64 56355 (fine); 50034 B at v1.10.1 ->
|
||||
# base64 66712, truncated to exactly 65536. The cap corresponds to a 49152 B
|
||||
# Dockerfile, so this release's comment growth crossed it by 882 B. It killed
|
||||
# v1.10.0 (run 704, where a stale clipboard assertion hid it) and v1.10.1
|
||||
# (run 707). With zero warnings there is no sourceInfo, so the longest metadata
|
||||
# line drops from 65536 to ~1936 chars and the Dockerfile's SIZE stops being
|
||||
# coupled to CI passing at all.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# If this ever recurs — job red, zero failing steps, suite reporting 0 failed —
|
||||
# grep the job log for `ghadelimiter` first.
|
||||
# pi-devbox — variant image
|
||||
#
|
||||
# FROMs a base-<hash> image produced by Dockerfile.base and adds only
|
||||
@@ -154,11 +188,11 @@ ARG USER_NAME=developer
|
||||
# (e7d77dc -> 1529e14 -> 731c3d4 in the nine days to 2026-10-01), so waiting for
|
||||
# a tag means holding pi indefinitely. A full SHA keeps the one property
|
||||
# `master` does not have: rebuilding this tag later produces the SAME image.
|
||||
# v1.9.5 SKIPPED 0.99.x and 1.0.0 for lack of evidence. v1.10.1 went and got the
|
||||
# v1.9.5 SKIPPED 0.99.x and 1.0.0 for lack of evidence. v1.10.2 went and got the
|
||||
# evidence instead of waiting for obsmem to mention a version, because "no issue
|
||||
# names 1.0" is an absence of a statement, not a measurement.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# v1.10.1: 0.87.1 -> 1.0.0. MEASURED 2026-10-02 against the published npm
|
||||
# v1.10.2: 0.87.1 -> 1.0.0. MEASURED 2026-10-02 against the published npm
|
||||
# tarballs for 0.87.1 and 1.0.0, unpacked side by side:
|
||||
# 1. NO `### Breaking Changes` SECTION IN 1.0.0 AT ALL. The changelog's
|
||||
# breaking sections belong to 0.87.0, 0.86.0, 0.84.3, 0.84.0, 0.83.0,
|
||||
@@ -273,7 +307,7 @@ ARG PI_ATELIER_REPO=https://github.com/michaelmjhhhh/pi-atelier.git
|
||||
# pi >=0.84.0, so it still spans the pinned 0.85.1. 13 commits v0.10.1..v0.10.3,
|
||||
# all under src/ tests/ docs/ scripts/ plus metadata; no entry-point move.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# v1.10.1: v0.10.3 -> v0.13.0, closing the two-minor gap v1.9.5 flagged as the
|
||||
# v1.10.2: v0.10.3 -> v0.13.0, closing the two-minor gap v1.9.5 flagged as the
|
||||
# residual risk of the pi bump. peerDependencies are UNCHANGED at pi >=0.84.0
|
||||
# across v0.10.3, v0.12.1 and v0.13.0 — still a FLOOR, so still not evidence of
|
||||
# anything; the floor is satisfied by 1.0.0 either way. What was actually
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user